Materiality is a crucial concept in the context of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) sustainability risks and opportunities. It refers to the significance or relevance of an ESG issue to an organisation’s business, strategy, and long-term financial performance.  Further, materiality in the context of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) sustainability refers to the significance or relevance of an ESG issue to a company’s performance, stakeholders, or the environment. It involves identifying and prioritizing ESG issues that have the potential to impact the company’s ability to create long-term value.[1]

Thousands of publicly listed companies around the world are now measuring, managing and reporting on ESG issues (Ioannou and Serafeim 2019)[2]. This is a relatively recent phenomenon with most companies having initiated their ESG strategies in the last decade. Companies are now appointing C-level executives to execute these strategies and setting public, ambitious targets on issues ranging from carbon reductions, to diversity and employee or product safety (Li, Ioannou and Serafeim 2015). At the same time, the number of investors committed to integrating ESG issues in investment decisions and actively engaging with companies on ESG issues has grown exponentially. The Principles for Responsible Investment now has more than 2,300 signatories who have more than $89 trillion in assets under management.[3]

ESG Frameworks and Standards provide guidelines for companies to assess materiality in the context of sustainability risks and opportunities. Some of the commonly used ESG frameworks and standards include:

1. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI):[4] The GRI Standards help companies identify, prioritize, and report on material sustainability topics that impact their stakeholders and business performance. The GRI Standards emphasize the importance of stakeholder engagement in determining materiality.

2. Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB): SASB standards focus on the disclosure of material ESG factors that are likely to impact the financial performance of companies within specific industries. SASB standards help companies identify ESG issues that are financially material.

3. Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD): TCFD framework focuses on climate-related risks and opportunities[5]. It helps companies assess and disclose climate-related risks and opportunities that are material to their business.

Further in emphasising the importance of materiality in identifying and managing ESG risks and opportunities, materiality assessment involves the following;

• Identifying relevant ESG issues.
• Assessing their impact on the organization’s financial performance and long-term sustainability.
• Prioritizing issues based on their materiality.

In addition to that, material ESG issues are those that have a significant impact on the organisation’s financial performance, that are relevant to stakeholders and align with the organization’s strategy and goals.

Moreover, conducting a materiality assessment helps organizations to focus on the most critical ESG issues, manage risks and capitalize on opportunities, enhance transparency and disclosure and improve decision-making and strategic planning. By applying ESG frameworks and standards, organizations can ensure a comprehensive and structured approach to materiality assessment, ultimately contributing to a more sustainable and resilient business model.

ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) risks and opportunities refer to the potential impacts on an organization’s performance and value creation arising from factors related to the environment, social responsibility, and corporate governance. In terms of environmental risks and opportunities, these include climate change, resource scarcity and biodiversity loss. In the context of social risks and opportunities, an organisation looks at labor practices, product safety and quality as well as community relations. In governance, risks and opportunities also arise from board diversity and independence, executive compensation, anti-corruption and ethics.

Practically, International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 1 requires a company to disclose material information about the sustainability‑related risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect its prospects. These sources of guidance are provided to help companies identify sustainability‑related risks and opportunities as well as disclosure requirements applicable to those sustainability‑related risks and opportunities.

In terms of Greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) disclosure and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 2 a company is required to disclose its absolute GHG emissions, expressed as metric tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e)[6]. Emissions must be measured in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard unless a jurisdiction requires a company to use a different approach to measurement.  A company is required to provide information about Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 GHG emissions. In that context, a company is required to disclose information about the characteristics of each target, how it sets and reviews each target, and its performance against each target.

Further, in industry‑based metrics, IFRS S2 requires a company to disclose information on industry‑based metrics that are associated with common business models and activities in a particular industry. As the effects of climate‑related risks and opportunities vary significantly by activity or industry, such metrics are important for investor understanding.

With 77 different industry-specific standards[7] across 10 sectors, the complete content of each standard will depend on the industry and the material disclosures[8]. In general, each standard includes the following:

• Disclosure topics: refer to the areas under which risks and opportunities most likely to affect the organization’s value creation have been identified.
• Accounting metrics: These are the quantitative and qualitative metrics through which a company will evaluate its performance for each of the material disclosure topics.
• Technical protocols: Using an ESG framework like the SASB Standards means following verified and science-based methodologies that can be verified by third parties. The technical protocols provide guidance on definitions, scope, implementation, compilation and presentation for each accounting metric.
• Activity metrics: These metrics are about the scale of the company’s business, which provides important context for assessing the data provided in the accounting metrics.

Conclusively, companies use these frameworks and standards to assess materiality by considering factors such as the impact of ESG issues on financial performance, reputation, regulatory compliance, stakeholder expectations, and overall sustainability goals. By identifying material ESG risks and opportunities, companies can integrate sustainability into their overall business strategy, manage risks effectively, and seize opportunities for long-term value creation.

For further inquiries, you may contact our Corporate Law Practice Group on info@mmmlawfirm.co.zw

[1] Financial materiality information is defined by opinions of the U.S. Supreme Court to refer to information that if disclosed would have a substantial likelihood of being viewed by a reasonable investor as having significantly alter the “total mix” of information available (TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc., 426 U.S. 438, 449). Moreover, The determination of materiality and duty to disclose lies with corporations, which are subject to federal securities laws.

[2]https://scholar.google.com/scholar

[3] https://www.unpri.org/pri/about-the-pri

[4] www.globalreporting.org

[5] www.tcfdhub.org

[6] https://www.iasplus.com/en/standards/ifrs-sds/ifrs-s2

[7] Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), 2018. Sustainability Accounting Standards for 77 Industries, www.sasb.org

[8] https://sasb.ifrs.org/standards/download/